Saturday, 21 November 2015

Black Hole lensing and existence by holographic retrojection

Hawking's interpretation does not seem to take into account that the quantum vacuum itslef is not existent, but induces existence, as likewise we found out that time does not exist but duration and motion when quantizing space-time of Einstein's Relativity (Hilbert space) ...
But what about the interpretation? what is meant by a different universe? and within BMS (Bondi–van der Burg–Metzner–Sachs), supertranslation subgroups, Ward-Takahashi identity, Super-Yang-Mills, etc. the action of the graviton, say a massless giant gravition is refering to AdS5 phase space WITHIN the dirichlet boundaries, hence it is a THEORY of a holographic projection WITHIN the SAME quantum vacuum!
Because gravity is interpreted as a bosonic state which it is NOT, gravity is in relation to the quantum vacuum and its --->photonic density, creating mass states by Efimov-quark-antiquark like quasi states INTO the quantum vacuum by the BEC photon condensate at THIS Planck density <--- you see there between the arrows first signs of a holographic rear projection so that Hawking's interpretaion, when it is what I assume, is not taking into account that the states of THIS quantum vacuum are ReProjected by apparent BH horizons from the quantum world into the real world AT BOTH Planes of Existence which do not form a different universe,!
They are so to say stabilizing themeselves, there is no other side so to say, no group to be switched between anti-matter or matter or between quantum world and real world, we do not have yet a terminology for this, I think?
EInstein's theory of relativity (STR and GTR) describe mostly the real world, hence, when it comes to quantization of space-time at Planck Scale, it fails to explain the further observations but is coherent with itslef so to say, but breaks at FTL phenomena, and we found out that time does not exist. hence the same here:
Hawking's theory is correct when it decribes a BH and the quantum information theory, but this is a new phenomon so to say, we may find out that there is not just a quantum vacuum but that the Q-states we observe "here" and which we interprete as waves and particles etc, are reprojected energy states which condensate as mass in simple terms - a BH is like an imploded 4D star - and we have the same properties for a particle in general, the same sort of a quasi singularity- there maths is incomplete, the parallel lines meet at infinity and 'link" the upper and lower boundary of the absolute zero so that Riemann's zeta gives stability constraints for the photonic gauge (a sort of a gauged neutrino, I assume (Koide formular),to condensate mass.
So far so good, it is like an inverted matrix (conotation) which is revealed by the data of galaxy clusters to the very small, the cosmological principle is disproved, I have no better words for this, I have described it the best I could in my blog.

Maths FAILS at the physical zero!! There is no Zero in a mathematical sense! There is no zero quantum vacuum!! There is No singularity: these are Quasi singularities wich link the upper and lower boundary of the absolute zero of the quantum vacuum by quasi singularities between particles and BH! Which are in general the same!!
zero is not a constant: the upper value of zero can be stretched to infinity, as the lower to minus infinty, Riemann Zeta Zero distribution (zero values of Zeta function correlate to nuclei and may indicate the threshold between quantum and real world, between phases of matter AND energy).
By an inverse Boltzmann distribution there are temperatures below zero Kelvin, temperature is not energy! zero is not a one point value, not a directed scalar, but indicates a threshold between energy and matter in an n-dimensional transition.
to give a more understandable example: zero dollar and you have no dollar, zero Apple and you are a lucky guy :-)|
But Nothing is not no thing, try to create zero space? in physics zero does not mean nothing, There is NO zero space in a mathematical sense.
_M R S S Shourie

Matter,antimatter,dark matter,what about dark antimatter?

"Matter,antimatter,dark matter,what about dark antimatter?" What puts this all in conflict and turmoil is each persons subscribing to the term, in SUSY it is the anti-"partner" some say the opposite charge sign,some just think it is the evil twin out to get us, the opposite of the normal be it in observation of the negative or the positive it doesn't matter, the equality of distribution in infinity is a localized field represented by EMFields and Matter fields, in some areas such as Plasma Field of positive ions it is balance to antimatter -
- but antimatter is unstable unshielded at the quantum level and at the macro level though still unstable and radioactive it's quantity is sufficient to maintain it's ability not to annihilate at once giving it's long half life this aided by the so called dark matter field separating the EMField at that point,the dark matter field acts as an insulator against the annihilation process,again,
- this is not at every point in space of this situation,when researching this on a quantum level the antimatter particles are not separate entities of matter but the same atom carrying it's anti charge,a proton and electron are by virture of the opposing charge matter and anti matter to each other and not being the same means nothing...
->the charge to mass ratio of the electron to the proton will show you this, it may be smaller but pound for pound as the saying goes puts it on an even field,now you can charge conjugate an atom and classify it as antimatter as well...nature does it all the time...this is where the positron appears"
Further Reading:
M R S S Shourie

The term "Particle Physics" is a little bit misleading

The term "Particle Physics" is a little bit misleading. "High Energy Physics" is more accurate to describe this discipline. In our current understanding of Quantum Mechanics in the framework of "Quantum Field Theory" (which is the mathematical tool to study Particle Physics) every thing whether it's matter or interaction is basically a smooth field occupying a region of the Space-time. This field is waves and not particles. Particles only appear when the fields are excited in a point of the Space-time. They are "excitation" of the fields.
In the modern perspective and revision of basic Quantum Mechanics, the Wave-Particle Duality postulate is not 100% symmetry or duality between waves and particles, the waves are considered to be more fundamental than particles.
Furthermore, in Superstring theory, the particles are suggested to be waves of tiny one dimensional strings vibrating in 10 dimensional space and each mode of vibration gives birth to a particular particle of matter or interaction. As a consequence, the three points vertex in Feynman Diagrams ( the sticks representing the interactions) transforms from a point to a smooth tube of strings.



Standard Model Update



With the help of CERN’s Large Hadron Collider (LHC), an international team of researchers have found evidence of something physicists have spent decades hoping for – subatomic particles behaving in a way that defies the Standard Model. In particle physics, the Standard Model is the best theory we have for explaining how particles behave and interact; however, it is incomplete as it does not account for gravity. By using the LHC, researchers hope to observe conditions that violate the standard rules of particle physics.
The team of physicists looked at data collected from the LHC’s first run from 2011-2012 – a run made famous for the discovery of the Higgs boson – and found the evidence they were looking for: Leptons defying the Standard Model. Leptons are a group of subatomic particles comprised of three different varieties: the tau, the electron, and the muon. Electrons are very stable, whereas both the tau and muon decay very rapidly.
In the new study, the researchers combed through data looking for evidence of B mesons decaying into lighter particles such as the tau lepton and the muon. The Standard Model dictates that all leptons shall be treated by all the fundamental forces, a concept known as "lepton universality." This means both the tau and the muon should decay at the same rate, once the difference in mass is accounted for. However the team discovered a miniscule, albeit noticeable, difference in the rates of decay which could indicate the presence of potentially unknown forces or particles interfering with the rates of decay.
"The Standard Model says the world interacts with all leptons in the same way. There is a democracy there. But there is no guarantee that this will hold true if we discover new particles or new forces," one of the lead researchers, Hassan Jawahery, from the University of Maryland in the US, said in a statement. "Lepton universality is truly enshrined in the Standard Model. If this universality is broken, we can say that we've found evidence for non-standard physics."
These results compliment a similar discovery from the 2012 BaBar experiment conducted at Stanford’s Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC). The BaBar experiment also focused on B meson decay; however, unlike the LHC which smashes protons together, the SLAC used colliding electrons to drive their experiment. Despite the different methods, having two experiments with similar results is key, and suggestive of real physics.
Further experimentation is needed to confirm the latest findings. In April of this year, the LHC reopened following a two year hiatus for upgrades. Since the LHC came back online, researchers have observed record-breaking energy levels, and the team is confident that they will have a better chance of observing more particle behavior that defies the Standard Model and corroborates these findings.
"We are planning a range of other measurements. The LHCb experiment is taking more data during the second run right now," Jawahery stated in a statement. "Any knowledge from here on helps us learn more about how the universe evolved to this point. For example, we know that dark matter and dark energy exist, but we don't yet know what they are or how to explain them. Our result could be a part of that puzzle [...] If we can demonstrate that there are missing particles and interactions beyond the Standard Model, it could help complete the picture."
The findings will be published in the September 4 issue of Physical Review Letters.
_Shourie M R S S (Dr Cube)

Black Hole Lensing and Existence by holographic retrojection

Black Hole Lensing and Existence by holographic retrojection
Black Hole Lensing (BHL) and Existence (Big Bang - as a phase of existence by inducing mass) by holographic rear projection (retrojection).
Comments by Oliver Thewalt
about the Paper:
How to Recover a Qubit That Has Fallen Into a Black Hole
by
Aidan Chatwin-Davies, Adam S. Jermyn, Sean M. Carroll
---------------------------
In my opinion this is based on OUTDATED assumptions and theories about black holes .. these are NOT like the Wheeler picture suggested ... "black monsters that devour matter" ...
This discussion about the quantum information paradox and Hawking radiation was important, but there are no firewalls and there are no gravitational waves, so that this is, in my view, the wrong question because black holes enable a stable universe and by this life by black hole lensing:
... the holographic properties of black holes seem to be confirmed, so that Black Hole Lensing (BHL) states that the holographic retrojection (rear projection (in deutsch: "Rückprojektion")) of antimatter via exziton like quasi majorana states are projecting matter via ->states of quark antiquark pairs (tripletts, quaternionletts etc, pentaquarks! --> Efimov states ...) by mass (v<c) from the quasi quantum world into the real world at infinite apparent horizons inducing those optical magnetic fields (quark swirl --> gluons) ...
Moreover, quasi singularities in protons are in conjunction with quasi singularities at black holes, which seem to confirm the boundary pircture at infinity of the absolute zero (see also: inverse boltzmann distribution, Unruh Radiation,..., Riemann's Zeta function: distribution of zero values as stability constraints for atomic nuclei) ...
... and we now have an idea why we thought that these are singularities ...
Mathematics is incomplete
In point of fact, our mathematics is just incomplete for a circle number pi, that allows two parallel lines as a tangent on a cricle to meet at INFINITY.
In addition, these parallel lines are a result of RETROJECTION of a complex RECONJUGATED string plane (for which we might have no name, if Mark Simpson or George Shiber don't have) as a holographic 2D Projection INTO this 2D real world sheet!!
The LENS is reenabled by the HiggsField (=Dark Matter, thanks Micheal Balmer) which works like a space lens projector as an INSULATOR (Aharonov-Bohm effect in "real world" is greeting!) into the real world, like a mini wormhole, but "lensing" a EPR BCS like BEC Darktron ...
Furthermore, we know that FTL communication, if possible, despite the no-cloning theorem, would have no effect on the real world, at least concerning a possible reaction because there is no cause & effect in the quantum world but in the real world .. this cannot be broken!
Michael Balmer said once on the Antimatter thread at my wall (Facebook):
https://www.facebook.com/oliver.thewalt/posts/10151589171581473
Excerpt, quote of Michael Balmer:
https://www.facebook.com/michael.balmer.14
".. and the second is where it all began,the misunderstanding of anti-matter, true annihilation upon contact of the opposing charges is one result,but the annihilation is of the particle not in the matter but in it's charge of matter....energy conversion...light and or pure electricity, hmmm,clarify,the contact of an electron and positron does not annihilate either atom but ionizes both,creating plasma and plasma remains plasma until each relevant charge has be reestablished,,does this tell of what anti-matter is not completely, what is known...
... some maybe not all is that existence is possible because of three aspects of nature: negative, positive and neutral charges and matter at it's base is a neutral (particle or string) string?
Another time on that, for this reality negative is in the form of an electron and positive in the form of a proton,both are particles of matter...both are part of a field,one of a matter field the other a anti-matter field, not completely,what is known... " Unquote
My viewpoint on the above excerpt:
"Hence, antimatter is part of a bosonic field, which is unstable at quantum level on account of being part of quantum vacuum - quasi Faster Than Light - but insulated by a BEC condensate within the Higgs field -- Region of Neutrality (thanks Michael Balmer) - and becomes a matter boson - part of the "higgs boson" - below the Speed of Light threshold in conjunction with light (photon) and electricity (EM field + electron), so that it works like a quasi Higgs Boson, enabling matter on quark level via charge conjugation AGAINST a negative space vacuum ....
.. and this is what makes the proton stable, the anti-proton exists only on quantum level..."
*Quote*:
*Michael Balmer, 01. Jan 2015, 10:21 AM ("Antimatter Thread", FB Profile of Oliver Thewalt)*
"Matter, antimatter, dark matter,what about dark antimatter? What puts this all in conflict and turmoil is each persons subscribing to the term, in Susy it is the anti-"partner" some say the opposite charge sign,some just think it is the evil twin out to get us,the opposite of the normal be it in observation of the negative or the positive it doesn't matter,the equality of distribution in infinity is a localized field represented by EMFields and Matter fields, in some areas such as Plasma Field of positive ions it is balance to antimatter but antimatter is unstable unshielded at the quantum level and at the macro level though still unstable and radioactive it's quantity is sufficient to maintain it's ability not to annihilate at once giving it's long half life this aided by the so called dark matter field separating the EMField at that point,the dark matter field acts as an insulator against the annihilation process, again, this is not at every point in space of this situation, when researching this on a quantum level the antimatter particles are not separate entities of matter but the same atom carrying it's anti charge,a proton and electron are by virture of the opposing charge matter and anti matter to each other and not being the same means nothing...
... the charge to mass ratio of the electron to the proton will show you this, it may be smaller but pound for pound as the saying goes puts it on an even field, now you can charge conjugate an atom and classify it as antimatter as well...nature does it all the time...this is where the positron appears."
Unquote
This excellent post by *_George Shiber_* argues in a similar way, but still upholds the SUSY hypothesis:
*A Fukaya-Categorical Analysis Of The Sasaki-Einstein ‘AdS/CFT’ Holographic Renormalization Of Quantum Gravity*
*Complex ReConjugation*
Prime numbers may indicate constraints of existence for BH Lenses in the Higgs-Field as a kind of BEC Photon Condensation (remember: the photon is a partition of space at the speed of light threshold, scaled by Planck Density´, I assume, as imaginary space photon boundary) ...
...in conjunction with the distribution of the zero values of Riemann's Zeta and prime dividers (factors) for stochastic probability constraints of mass condensating in the Quantum Foam via photonic majorana quasi states (bi-photon tachyonic "pair"x-tetts" as mini BH transforming into wormhole EPR-like states mediated by (anti)neutrino ... AT EVERY "SPACE DOT" - this is a kind of gravity scale via the photon (-->mass) space (->lense distribution matrices ) "Density" (=boundary) ...
- as an allegory just use a Quantum Dot Screen which is "dotted" by a holographic (complex conjugated INTRINSIC BH <-> wormhole transmission holographic Re-Projector -
... means mathematics which is neither just non-abelian or just complex or just in any euclidean plane inducing any Euler Theorem or Euler identity as geometric interpretation of the Euler Lagrangian potentials which indicate any zero gravity potential between matter (postitive "Dot-charge" conjugate Projection) and space (negative "Dot-Charge" ReTrojection (by BHL)!
Mathematics needs therefore a Re-Projecting BHL upgrade, so to say, which is enabled by Phases of Existence (may be Planck Density) Retrojecting by BHL - Wave (BH quasi singularities "scaled" (lensed) by Prime numbers and dividers via a Zeta Manifold conjugate INTO MINI BH EPR BCS BEC Darktron WAVE ...
- you see the ends of this SINGLE SCALAR WAVE is waving into opposite directions (Zero upper >|< lower bounadry - Mini BH >|< Wormhole Darktron (Pairs) at full amplitude to a finite point (Space dots) in space and backwards ... as in the FaTe Model of the String Theory Development Group predicted)...
... allowing ReProjective "Prime scaled" conjugated Operators and not just hermitian adjoint operators, hence a kind of retrojective transposing Space Dot Sphere Plane (former geometry, may be string has this already or LQG) ...
It is ironical that this imaginary gluon picture with these (fancy) colors fits perfectly into the "Quantum-Dot Space" (a "Quantum Foam Darktron Condensate", a terminology which I propose here, although any String or existing LQG terminology will suffice as well) so to say ..
Gravity may be Gravity potentials by Black Holes lensing Mass into Space....
A gauge field potential which is induced by mass against space ....
BHs are reprojecting this lens potential via a Dark Matter BEC space partition -- = photon (OM-Fields) -- ... at the space dots.
"Dotting Mass" into the Quantum Foam via the weak and strong (nuclear) Force (remember Mini-BH quasi lens potential transponing into those EPR Waves (Mini Wormholes in particles) and we have a kind of Kaluza-Klein compactification of "BHL space dotting" into those colorful optical (--> QCD, gluons) and Magnetic - Quantum Magentic Flux - Fields as an extended effective gauge-lens (field) theory - in fact not any (Lie) group but projecting those groups!
Warp Drive - or Dot-(Donut) Spacing?
You might have to "simulate" as a first thought a negative charge potential (charge spin identity) Lens at any Space Dot permanently -- permanently "reprojecting" (or "rear-projecting"), means measuring those quasi majorana exziton-like state potentials at the space dot zeta zero values coming into existence and permanently switching from WITHIN to WITHOUT states ("inside" - to "outside" which is the same but in a different "quantum transmission") in order to PROJECT a quasi Vector Potential on a holographic Bloch Sphere.
My proposal is to look upon this as a simulated direction WITHIN the in-between states (Mini BH - EPR Wave), so that it induces a void tube, and can thus be interpreted as relocation of a mass WITHIN its own phase of existence by a Black Hole Lens ... ->dotting, which expresses what occurs: ...
.... One may be of the opinion that the Donut-shaped vessel has relocated to, lets say Andromeda, but the universe is INDUCING existence by mass and motion (duration <>Time -- photon ---- Mass ) so that those Space Dot Matrices just have RETROJECTED you at your deserved "location " at this holographic Bloch Sphere.
This is the reason it has been coined Dot-(donut) Spacing by me.
Since this is a first propoal, any terminology may be replaced by known string or LQG terms.
Gravity might hence be a space dot (BH) lens (projected by reprojecting) potential.
-------------------------------------
*Comment by Lubos Motl on his Blog - The Reference Frame*:
-----------------------------------------------
How to Recover a Qubit That Has Fallen Into a Black Hole
Aidan Chatwin-Davies, Adam S. Jermyn, Sean M. Carroll
(Submitted on 13 Jul 2015)
We demonstrate an algorithm for the retrieval of a qubit, encoded in spin angular momentum, that has been dropped into a no-firewall unitary black hole. Retrieval is achieved analogously to quantum teleportation by collecting Hawking radiation and performing measurements on the black hole. Importantly, these methods only require the ability to perform measurements from outside the event horizon and to collect the Hawking radiation emitted after the state of interest is dropped into the black hole.
How to Recover a Qubit That Has Fallen Into a Black Hole
Guest Post: Aidan Chatwin-Davies on Recovering One Qubit from a Black Hole
Guest Post at Preposterous Universe
---------------------------------------
Suggested Reading:
Can anything travel faster than the speed of light? 'Lightning' seen sparking from a supermassive black hole appears to break the laws of physics
Discussion at Google Plus:
Stephen Hawking's interpretation:
Hawking presents new idea on how information could escape black holes Hawking: information loss in black holes could be stored in alternate universes
Regardless, both of these features are problematic because they might contradict what is known as the Cosmological Principle.
The new biggest thing in the universe, and why it’s a headache for scientists -Cosmological principle
Stephen Hawking says he has a way to escape from a black hole
-- Continued: About Hawking's interpretation -- Comment by Oliver 'Thewalt
Hawking's interpretation does not seem to take into account that the quantum vacuum itslef is not existent, but induces existence, as likewise we found out that time does not exist but duration and motion when quantizing space-time of Einstein's Relativity (Hilbert space) ...
But what about this interpretation? What is meant by a different universe? And within BMS (Bondi–van der Burg–Metzner–Sachs), supertranslation subgroups, Ward-Takahashi identity, Super-Yang-Mills, the action of the graviton, say a massless giant gravition is refering to AdS5 phase space WITHIN the dirichlet boundaries, hence it is a THEORY of a holographic projection WITHIN the SAME quantum vacuum!
Because gravity is interpreted as a bosonic state which it is NOT, gravity is in relation to the quantum vacuum and its --->photonic density, creating mass states by Efimov-quark-antiquark like quasi states INTO the quantum vacuum by the BEC photon condensate at THIS Planck density <--- you see there between the arrows first signs of a holographic rear projection so that Hawking's interpretaion, when it is what I assume, is not taking into account that the states of THIS quantum vacuum are rear projected by apparent BH horizons from the quantum world into the real world AT BOTH Planes of Existence, which do not form a different universe!
They are so to say stabilizing themeselves, there is no other side so to say, no group to be switched between anti-matter or matter or between quantum world and real world, we do not have yet a terminology for this, I think?
Einstein's theory of relativity (STR and GTR) describes mostly the real world, hence, when it comes to quantization of space-time at Planck Scale, it fails to explain the further observations but is coherent with itslef so to say, but breaks at FTL phenomena, and we found out that time does not exist. Hence the same here:
Hawking's theory is correct when it decribes a Black Hole and the quantum information theory, but what was described here is still an unknown phenomenon,
We may find out that there is not just a quantum vacuum, but that the Quantum-states which we observe (at our plane of existence) and which we interprete as waves and particles, are reprojected energy states which condensate as mass in simple terms ....
....A Black Hole is like an imploded 4D star - and we have the same properties for a particle in general, the same sort of a quasi singularity- there maths is incomplete, the parallel lines meet at infinity and 'link" the upper and lower boundary of the absolute zero so that Riemann's zeta gives stability constraints for the photonic gauge (a sort of a gauged neutrino, I assume (Koide formular https://nige.wordpress.com/…/koide-formula-seen-from-a-dif…/ ) to condensate mass.
It is like an inverted matrix (connotation) which is revealed by the data of galaxy clusters to the very small, the cosmological principle is disproved.

Mathematics is incomplete at the physical zero
In the quantum vacuum there is no zero in a mathematical sense. There is no zero quantum vacuum.
There is no singularity: these are quasi singularities which link the upper and lower boundary of the absolute zero of the quantum vacuum by quasi singularities between particles and black holes, which are in general doing the same.
Read more: Discussion in GUT (Grand Unification Theories in Physics)) group, Facebook
Zero is not a constant: the upper value of zero can be stretched to infinity, as the lower to minus infinty, Riemann Zeta Zero distribution (zero values of Zeta function correlate to nuclei and may indicate the threshold between quantum and real world, between phases of matter AND energy).
By an inverse Boltzmann distribution there are temperatures below zero Kelvin, temperature is not energy! zero is not a one point value, not a directed scalar, but indicates a threshold between energy and matter in an n-dimensional transition.

A temperature below absolute zero
Atoms at negative absolute temperature are the hottest systems in the world
But Nothing is not no thing, try to create zero space? In physics zero does not mean nothing - *there is no zero space in a mathematical sense.*
The journey to the other side of absolute zero
Further Reading:
Hawking presents new idea on how information could escape black holes
George Shiber, Quote:" This Structure Contradicts Standard Cosmology Models of the Universe: I told you Quantum Cosmology was False! " Unquote
"Ring" of gamma ray bursts may point to structure 5x larger than cosmological principle allows
Main Post at Hixgrid
Image Courtesy: George Shiber's Blog: Academic Reflections
                                                                                                           -Dr Cube (Shourie M R S S)

Mass, Quantum Energy States and why there are no gravitational waves

Mass, Quantum Energy States and why there are no gravitational waves
by Oliver Thewalt
Just to think about it: there is a deep link between "gravity" and mass, and mass and "Quantum energy states" (think of Black Hole Lensing and the matter creation process in the Higgs-Field) which are enabled by permanent quantum measurements (think of the difference between "existence" and a stochastic probability distribution) ...
.... so that it is worth a thought why in our observational plane the photon is its own anti and gravity is coupled to those Quantum energy states which condensate as mass by the photon, neutrinos and the (electro)weak and strong force: isn't the photon and this coupling factor, and by that what we observe as the speed of light coupled to a Planck density which enables this process?
This is why I wrote this:
In my opinion, a major confusion about the discovery of the higgs or how many higgs there might be and what finally induces mass is caused by a misconception about an interpretation of observations within a plane which hardly can fully be responsible for inducing mass as Quantum energy states in the real world (v<c), which moreover are induced by permanent and ongoing quantum measurements.
A proposal to look upon this are Black Holes which are rear projecting quark-antiquark pairs into a 2D world sheet (Black Hole Lensing).
... I have skipped here the matter creation process in the Higgs Field ....
.... This is why the quantum vacuum does not exist (higher plane, look at Hawking's recent theory announcement), but is inducing existence - so that you always compare 2 quantum measurements (e.g in Special Relativity). When quantizing space-time at Planck Scale, you'll detect that there is no time as such.
The quantum vacuum is according to this proposal inducing existence in the real world via Black Hole Lensing (higher plane) by mass.
....
Now, please rethink this concept of "gravitational waves" (!)

This is for my physicist friends - 1

This is for my physicist friends.
In 1962 R. Feynman was at a conference of “gravitationists”
in Warsaw, Poland. The outcome is the well-known Feyman’s paper about inconsistency in standard quantization of gravity he published later in Acta Pysica Polonica [Acta Physica Polonica 24: 697-722, 1963]. I want to present a few relatively small quotations from the letter Feynman wrote to his wife Gwеneth from Warsaw. I omit all his impressions of Warsaw and Warsaw restaurants.
… I am not getting anything out of the meeting , I am learning nothing. This field (because there are no experiments) is not an active one, so few of the best men are doing work in it.
… Remind me not to come to anymore gravity conferences.
… There are hosts of dopes here — and it is not good for my blood pressure — such inane things are said and seriously discussed.
… Whenever one starts to tell me about his “work” it is always either (1) completely un-understandable, or (2) vaguee and indefinite, or (3) something correct that is obvious and self-evident, or (4) a claim based on the stupidity of the author, that some obvious and correct thing accepted and checked for years is, in fact, false (these are the worst — no argument will convince the idiot), or (5) an attempt to do something probably impossible, but certainly of no utility, or (6) just plain wrong. There is a great deal of “activity in the field” these days — but this activity is mainly in showing that the previous “activity” of somebody else resulted in nothing useful or in something promising, etc. ––
like a lot of worms trying to get out of a bottle by crawling all over each other.
From Michelle Feynman’s book “Perfectly reasonable…” Page 137.